翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Criminal sentencing in Canada
・ Criminal sentencing in the United States
・ Criminal speech
・ Criminal Statutes Repeal Act 1861
・ Criminal stereotype of African Americans
・ Criminal syndicalism
・ Criminal Tango
・ Criminal tattoo
・ Criminal transmission of HIV
・ Criminal transmission of HIV in the United States
・ Criminal Tribes Act
・ Criminal Code of Belarus
・ Criminal Code of Finland
・ Criminal Code of Russia
・ Criminal Conversation
Criminal conversation
・ Criminal conversion
・ Criminal Copyright Law in the United States
・ Criminal costs
・ Criminal Court
・ Criminal Court of Thailand
・ Criminal Courts of Justice (Dublin)
・ Criminal damage in English law
・ Criminal Defence Service Act 2006
・ Criminal defense lawyer
・ Criminal defenses
・ Criminal deportation
・ Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008
・ Criminal gang
・ Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Criminal conversation : ウィキペディア英語版
Criminal conversation

At common law, criminal conversation, commonly known as ''crim. con.'', is a tort arising from adultery, abolished in many jurisdictions.
It is similar to breach of promise, a tort involving a broken engagement against the betrothed, and alienation of affection, a tort action brought by a deserted spouse against a third party.
==History of criminal conversation==
Initially, criminal conversation was an action brought by a husband for compensation for the breach of fidelity with his wife.〔''Black's Law Dictionary'', 4th ed. 1957.〕
The tort was abolished in England and Wales in 1857, but persisted in Ireland long after (Northern Ireland retained it until 1939, and the Republic of Ireland until 1976). It still exists in parts of the United States, but the application has changed. At least 29 states have abolished the tort by statute and another 4 have abolished it judicially.
Suits for criminal conversation reached their height in late 18th and early 19th-century England, where large sums, often between £10,000 and £20,000, could be demanded by the plaintiff, for debauching his wife. These suits were conducted at the Court of the King's Bench in Westminster Hall, and were highly publicised by publishers such as Edmund Curll and in the newspapers of the day. Although neither the plaintiff, defendant, nor the wife accused of the adultery were permitted to take the stand, evidence of the adulterous behaviour was presented by servants or observers.
A number of very sensational cases were heard in the second half of the 18th century, including ''Grosvenor v. Cumberland'' in 1769, where Lord Grosvenor sued the King's brother, the Duke of Cumberland for crim con with his wife, being awarded damages of £10,000; and ''Worsley v. Bisset'' in 1782, where Sir Richard Worsley lost his case against George Bisset, after it had been found that Sir Richard had colluded in his own dishonour, by showing his friend his wife Seymour Dorothy Fleming naked in a bath house.〔
〕 In 1796, the Earl of Westmeath was awarded £10,000 against his wife's lover, Augustus Bradshaw.〔''Earl of Westmeath v Bradshaw'' 1796 reported in ''Collected Speeches of John Philpot Curran'' New York 1811 p.163〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Criminal conversation」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.